Stock Market News

Plaintiffs ask US Supreme Court to temporarily halt Microsoft, Activision merger


The Microsoft store sign is pictured in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., January 18, 2022. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri

 

MSFT
+0.14%

Add to/Remove from Watchlist

Add to Watchlist

Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio

Type:

BUY
SELL

Date:

 

Amount:

Price

Point Value:


Leverage:

1:1
1:10
1:25
1:50
1:100
1:200
1:400
1:500
1:1000

Commission:


 

Create New Watchlist
Create

Create a new holdings portfolio
Add
Create

+ Add another position
Close

ATVI
+3.49%

Add to/Remove from Watchlist

Add to Watchlist

Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio

Type:

BUY
SELL

Date:

 

Amount:

Price

Point Value:


Leverage:

1:1
1:10
1:25
1:50
1:100
1:200
1:400
1:500
1:1000

Commission:


 

Create New Watchlist
Create

Create a new holdings portfolio
Add
Create

+ Add another position
Close

By John Kruzel

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A group of individual plaintiffs on Monday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to temporarily halt Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)’s $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI), the largest in the history of the videogame industry.

The bid by the plaintiffs was separate from a request by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to pause Microsoft’s purchase of Activision, maker of the “Call of Duty” videogame franchise.

The filing comes after the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last week rejected the FTC’s request, removing one of the few remaining hurdles stopping Xbox maker Microsoft from closing the deal and expanding its gaming business.

The FTC is considering its options after its losses in its bid to stop the deal, a source told Reuters on Monday amid expectations the agency’s fight is nearing the end.

Separately on Monday, Microsoft’s appeal against Britain’s block on its takeover of Activision Blizzard was formally paused by a London tribunal to give the parties more time to resolve the dispute.

Source

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button